From One Texas Mom to Another: My Mom’s Open Letter to Wendy Davis

I’m sitting in my new apartment – a cute two bedroom in Waco – unpacking boxes and trying to get settled in a city I’ve never been to before. After a long day of driving, loading and unloading boxes and furniture, and buying some basics for the apartment, I passed out early last night. This morning, I woke up to an email from my role model – my mom – about my move.

I’m excited to start organizing in Waco and kick off a dialogue about Wendy – and ever so grateful to my parents, who didn’t blink when I decided to take a year off of college to help get Wendy elected. This is the message my mom wanted you – and Wendy – to hear.

Dear Wendy,

I heard you speak at luncheon in Austin a couple of years ago. I was captivated by your words, your sincerity, your story, and your passion for Texas, Texans, women, children and a better future. I was moved to tears actually. I am a tough, type A, courtroom lawyer. I don’t do emotions, and certainly not in public over a rubber chicken plate. But I did that day, and have since. I was in a rush to leave. I wanted to share my experience with my daughter. I couldn’t then, and really still cannot, articulate what moved me. But it was something. Something important. Before I left though, I wanted you to know that your words meant something to me. Obviously to others too, as the line to shake your hand and have your attention for a few fleeting seconds was already the length of the ballroom. Patience not one of my virtues, I circled around the back of where you were standing and quietly said-That was f$&@!ng awesome. I told my daughter the same, and encouraged her to stay connected to what was happening here as she made her way through her first college semesters on the other side of the country.

She did. I did. She and I spent many hours at the Capitol last summer (her more than I), and I watched as she became more involved politically. More driven. More compelled. We were there on that magic night when our voices, along with thousands of others, were heard, and made a difference. When we finally left, in the early morning hours, we drove up Congress, the Capitol lit behind us, and the song Can’t Hold Us came on. Somber, not wanting, or really able to talk, the music did it for us, and that is now “our” song. My daughter went back to school at the end of the summer, but a bigger piece of her remained here than she had ever left before.

In calls with her during the fall semester she started dropping hints that she wanted to come home. To work on, with, and for, what you and others like you – too many name, but included in our gratitude and in this letter as if I could and did name them all-stand for and believe in. She wanted to come home. She wanted to make a difference. Her father and I encouraged her. She left school at the end of the fall semester and moved home.

She didn’t have a job on your campaign. She really didn’t have a plan. She didn’t know exactly what she could or would do, but knew she could do something. She volunteered. She got deputized to register voters. She registered voters. She went to meetings. She did field organizing. She walked until her feet were swollen. She spent hours on the bus because she had no driver’s license. She made calls. She sent emails. She talked to people. She became one of your fellows.

I helped where I could. I’ve handed out stacks of voter registration cards, asked countless people if they were registered to vote, talked to people about what is happening around and to them without their realizing they have a voice and a vote, staffed a voting location for the primary, and made a few financial contributions to you and similar candidates and causes.

But the “donation” I made to your campaign today was priceless. It was far beyond any check I could write. Today, my husband and I packed up our only child, our precious, kind, funny, smart, beautiful daughter, and took her to a new city where she knows no one. We helped her load and unload her typical college kid stuff (as well as dishes from our cabinets and all our living room furniture and dining table) into a strange new apartment in a strange new city. We filled 3 baskets at Target, so she could get through the first few days. (Ok, I can be emotional.) She starts her job next week as field organizer for you.

As I return home tonight to an empty house – without my baby girl (or any furniture), please know that what you do matters. Please know that people are so moved by you that they change their lives to support and assist you in what you seek to accomplish. Please know they are willing to move 1,593 miles, leave friends and family and devote 100% to the cause. Most important to me, please take care of my awesome young woman and use her talents wisely.

Godspeed to the Governor’s Mansion. MMK

Love you too, Mom.


Texas Politics: Don’t Mess with Texas Women

In the chaos of the last few days, I have gotten a better crash course in House & Senate rules, proceedings, and norms, than I ever could have imagined. At 12:30am last night, I somehow ended up in charge of the hundreds of people on the second floor (outside the Senate chamber entrance), listening to the live feed with headphones and shouting updates to those around me. A few women at the front of the crowd with me (and one very, very loud man) would quiet the floor by shouting “THERE’S AN ALEXIS UPDATE,” waiting to hear the latest news from inside the Senate gallery.

Impacts of SB5

There are some important ramifications of each of the provisions listed above. The bill would effectively shut down 37 of Texas’ 42 clinics, leaving only five open to service a state where getting from one corner to the next is a 14 hour drive. There would no longer be clinics in rural or border areas, leaving women with limited and strained financial resources to drive from El Paso to San Antonio for an abortion. Because of the sonogram bill passed in 2011, they will have to take several days off of work (or leave and return) to fulfill the 24 hour waiting period between the sonogram and abortion. The cost of an abortion in Texas would skyrocket from about $400 to about $1,200. Add the cost of transportation and hotel for the waiting period plus the cost of lost income, many women would be nowhere close to affording an abortion. Women will not stop getting abortions. There was compelling, tear filled, and tragic testimony in both the House & Senate this weekend that told the stories of women who grew up when abortion was not affordable and accessible — those women turned to butcher shops for back alley, unsterile, illegal abortions — or they did it themselves, drinking bleach or attempting dangerous versions of the procedure with coat hangers and other household items.

The Filibuster

Wendy Davis, one of (everyone’s) my personal heroes, stood from 11am to 3am the next day in attempts to block SB5, a bill that would cut off abortions after 20 weeks, require abortion clinics to obtain “Ambulatory Surgical Center” status, and require abortion providers to obtain privileges at a hospital within 30 miles of their clinic. SB5 included other restrictive provisions as well, and included no exceptions for rape or incest.

Wendy Davis stood on the Senate floor and actively filibustered this bill for 11 hours. Normal Senate rules operate on a variation of the “three strikes and you’re out” rule; three violations of Senate rules means that the body then votes to end the filibuster (which, in a GOP dominant house, was a certainty, should Davis have incurred her three “strikes.”)

Rule 4.03 of the Senate rules reads as follows:

Although there is no Senate rule by which a member
can be taken from the floor for pursuing “dilatory tactics” (40
S.J. Reg. 882 (1927)), a Senator who has been repeatedly called
to order for not confining his debate to the question before the
Senate may be required by the Senate to discontinue his
A point of order against further debate of a question by
a Senator on the ground that his remarks are not germane to the
question before the Senate is often disposed of by the chair with
a warning to the Senator who has the floor to confine his
remarks to the pending question.
When speaking, a member must confine himself to the
subject under debate. In discussing an amendment, the debate
must be confined to the amendment and not include the general
merits of the bill or other proposition.
The point of order having been raised for the third time
that a Senator who had the floor was filibustering and not
confining his remarks to the bill before the Senate, the chair
requested the Senate to vote on the point of order. It was
sustained and the Senator speaking yielded the floor (44 S.J.
Reg. 1780 (1935)).

and clearly states that only violations of germaneness can be used to end a filibuster. The  notes on this rule go on to make the distinction between germaneness violations and violations of other types even more clear:

Raising of a third point of order against further debate
by a Senator on the floor who has digressed for a third time
from a discussion of the pending amendment, after having been
twice requested to confine his debate to the amendment,
justifies the presiding officer in calling for a vote by the Senate
on the question of whether or not he shall be permitted to
resume and continue his remarks (50 S.J. Reg. 418 (1947)).

Her first violation was for germaneness, and the GOP argued that her testimony had gone so far off the topic of the bill put before the body (SB5) that it violated Senate rules. I would love to hear a coherent explanation of how Roe v Wade isn’t a germane subject when debating about a bill that places such a hefty burden on women seeking abortions clearly violates our constitutional rights to obtain an abortion, but the GOP was living in the land of incoherence last night. In fact, one GOP member asked this of Davis:

Is it your understanding that Roe v Wade provides women the right to obtain an abortion?

Strike one for GOP literacy, and sadly, strike one for Davis.

In late hours of the evening, Davis received a second strike — for receiving help from Senator Ellis as she put on a back brace. There was some pretty stunning and emotional testimony from Senators who supported and opposed the bill about the Senate tradition of filibustering — it has always been the case that the Senate has provided support to the person filibustering, even when they disagreed, often providing ice chips, orange slices, etc, and even, in at least one case, by forming a circle around the filibustering member to allow him to pee into a bucket. NEVER before last night has a filibustering member of the Senate faced such scrutiny.

It’s stunning that, in the middle of a debate about whether or not they had the right to legislate a woman’s body, they stopped to legislate whether or not the vastly courageous woman protesting this bill in front of them, representing the voice of millions of Texas women, had the right to control and make decisions about her own body.

Zaffirini, who supported the bill, rose to protest this “strike,” citing the only Senate rules that dictate a member’s conduct while addressing the body.

The rule: Rule 4.01.

When a Senator is about to speak in debate or to communicate any matter to the Senate, the member shall rise in his or her place and address the President of the Senate.

… and the only applicable note:

When a member has been recognized and is speaking on a motion to re-refer a bill, he must stand upright at his desk and may not lean thereon (61 S.J. Reg. 1760, 1762 (1969)).

There is no rule about touching another member of the body — and even if there was, it would not count as one of the three strikes.

When Davis received her third strike (only her second for germaneness) the Capitol went insane. The gallery erupted into cheers after Van de Putte’s question to the chair:


and those of us gathered on the second floor realized that if we could be loud enough, combined with those in the gallery, we could drown out the vote and run down the 20 minutes left on the clock… so that’s what we did. There was brilliant political maneuvering on the part of Senate Dems to run down the clock,  pointing out that Wendy didn’t have enough violations to justify an end to her filibuster. The loudness of everyone in the Capitol delayed the vote until after midnight. In the Capitol, we had no idea whether the vote would be considered valid, and kept cheering going until we got official word that the vote would not count.

The Senate clerk wrote down that the real vote did not start until 12:03am, but Senate Republicans actually went back and changed the time stamp on the vote in the official record. Luckily for us, over 100K people were watching the live feed, and someone leaked this photograph: 


There might be a second special session, and we’ll deal with that when and if it happens, but this should be one HUGE message to our legislature: You don’t mess with Texas women.

Clear eyes, full hearts, can’t lose. Thank you Wendy.

Texas Politics: Special Session to Consider SB5*

*The special session was supposed to include HB60 and HB16 as well, but both got postponed and SB5 quickly became the focal point of the session. HB60 and HB16 were folded into SB5.

Continue reading →