Texas Politics: Don’t Mess with Texas Women

In the chaos of the last few days, I have gotten a better crash course in House & Senate rules, proceedings, and norms, than I ever could have imagined. At 12:30am last night, I somehow ended up in charge of the hundreds of people on the second floor (outside the Senate chamber entrance), listening to the live feed with headphones and shouting updates to those around me. A few women at the front of the crowd with me (and one very, very loud man) would quiet the floor by shouting “THERE’S AN ALEXIS UPDATE,” waiting to hear the latest news from inside the Senate gallery.

Impacts of SB5

There are some important ramifications of each of the provisions listed above. The bill would effectively shut down 37 of Texas’ 42 clinics, leaving only five open to service a state where getting from one corner to the next is a 14 hour drive. There would no longer be clinics in rural or border areas, leaving women with limited and strained financial resources to drive from El Paso to San Antonio for an abortion. Because of the sonogram bill passed in 2011, they will have to take several days off of work (or leave and return) to fulfill the 24 hour waiting period between the sonogram and abortion. The cost of an abortion in Texas would skyrocket from about $400 to about $1,200. Add the cost of transportation and hotel for the waiting period plus the cost of lost income, many women would be nowhere close to affording an abortion. Women will not stop getting abortions. There was compelling, tear filled, and tragic testimony in both the House & Senate this weekend that told the stories of women who grew up when abortion was not affordable and accessible — those women turned to butcher shops for back alley, unsterile, illegal abortions — or they did it themselves, drinking bleach or attempting dangerous versions of the procedure with coat hangers and other household items.

The Filibuster

Wendy Davis, one of (everyone’s) my personal heroes, stood from 11am to 3am the next day in attempts to block SB5, a bill that would cut off abortions after 20 weeks, require abortion clinics to obtain “Ambulatory Surgical Center” status, and require abortion providers to obtain privileges at a hospital within 30 miles of their clinic. SB5 included other restrictive provisions as well, and included no exceptions for rape or incest.

Wendy Davis stood on the Senate floor and actively filibustered this bill for 11 hours. Normal Senate rules operate on a variation of the “three strikes and you’re out” rule; three violations of Senate rules means that the body then votes to end the filibuster (which, in a GOP dominant house, was a certainty, should Davis have incurred her three “strikes.”)

Rule 4.03 of the Senate rules reads as follows:

Although there is no Senate rule by which a member
can be taken from the floor for pursuing “dilatory tactics” (40
S.J. Reg. 882 (1927)), a Senator who has been repeatedly called
to order for not confining his debate to the question before the
Senate may be required by the Senate to discontinue his
A point of order against further debate of a question by
a Senator on the ground that his remarks are not germane to the
question before the Senate is often disposed of by the chair with
a warning to the Senator who has the floor to confine his
remarks to the pending question.
When speaking, a member must confine himself to the
subject under debate. In discussing an amendment, the debate
must be confined to the amendment and not include the general
merits of the bill or other proposition.
The point of order having been raised for the third time
that a Senator who had the floor was filibustering and not
confining his remarks to the bill before the Senate, the chair
requested the Senate to vote on the point of order. It was
sustained and the Senator speaking yielded the floor (44 S.J.
Reg. 1780 (1935)).

and clearly states that only violations of germaneness can be used to end a filibuster. The  notes on this rule go on to make the distinction between germaneness violations and violations of other types even more clear:

Raising of a third point of order against further debate
by a Senator on the floor who has digressed for a third time
from a discussion of the pending amendment, after having been
twice requested to confine his debate to the amendment,
justifies the presiding officer in calling for a vote by the Senate
on the question of whether or not he shall be permitted to
resume and continue his remarks (50 S.J. Reg. 418 (1947)).

Her first violation was for germaneness, and the GOP argued that her testimony had gone so far off the topic of the bill put before the body (SB5) that it violated Senate rules. I would love to hear a coherent explanation of how Roe v Wade isn’t a germane subject when debating about a bill that places such a hefty burden on women seeking abortions clearly violates our constitutional rights to obtain an abortion, but the GOP was living in the land of incoherence last night. In fact, one GOP member asked this of Davis:

Is it your understanding that Roe v Wade provides women the right to obtain an abortion?

Strike one for GOP literacy, and sadly, strike one for Davis.

In late hours of the evening, Davis received a second strike — for receiving help from Senator Ellis as she put on a back brace. There was some pretty stunning and emotional testimony from Senators who supported and opposed the bill about the Senate tradition of filibustering — it has always been the case that the Senate has provided support to the person filibustering, even when they disagreed, often providing ice chips, orange slices, etc, and even, in at least one case, by forming a circle around the filibustering member to allow him to pee into a bucket. NEVER before last night has a filibustering member of the Senate faced such scrutiny.

It’s stunning that, in the middle of a debate about whether or not they had the right to legislate a woman’s body, they stopped to legislate whether or not the vastly courageous woman protesting this bill in front of them, representing the voice of millions of Texas women, had the right to control and make decisions about her own body.

Zaffirini, who supported the bill, rose to protest this “strike,” citing the only Senate rules that dictate a member’s conduct while addressing the body.

The rule: Rule 4.01.

When a Senator is about to speak in debate or to communicate any matter to the Senate, the member shall rise in his or her place and address the President of the Senate.

… and the only applicable note:

When a member has been recognized and is speaking on a motion to re-refer a bill, he must stand upright at his desk and may not lean thereon (61 S.J. Reg. 1760, 1762 (1969)).

There is no rule about touching another member of the body — and even if there was, it would not count as one of the three strikes.

When Davis received her third strike (only her second for germaneness) the Capitol went insane. The gallery erupted into cheers after Van de Putte’s question to the chair:


and those of us gathered on the second floor realized that if we could be loud enough, combined with those in the gallery, we could drown out the vote and run down the 20 minutes left on the clock… so that’s what we did. There was brilliant political maneuvering on the part of Senate Dems to run down the clock,  pointing out that Wendy didn’t have enough violations to justify an end to her filibuster. The loudness of everyone in the Capitol delayed the vote until after midnight. In the Capitol, we had no idea whether the vote would be considered valid, and kept cheering going until we got official word that the vote would not count.

The Senate clerk wrote down that the real vote did not start until 12:03am, but Senate Republicans actually went back and changed the time stamp on the vote in the official record. Luckily for us, over 100K people were watching the live feed, and someone leaked this photograph: 


There might be a second special session, and we’ll deal with that when and if it happens, but this should be one HUGE message to our legislature: You don’t mess with Texas women.

Clear eyes, full hearts, can’t lose. Thank you Wendy.



  1. Thanks for this recap. Since I saw you were going to post on Matt’s FB feed last night I’ve been waiting for it. Bravo to you for helping get the job done.


  2. Thanks Elaine! I really can’t put explain how much support we got from people all around the country, nor how much it meant to us, especially during the late hours on Sunday & Monday. Please check back over the next few days — I’ll be posting about the special session and likely a post that examines a few of the broken Senate rules in more detail.


    1. Will do! One thing that struck me is that as an observer via the internet, I couldn’t hear anything the Parlimentarian said, to understand how what seemed like pretty arbitrary decisions were being made. Does that stuff ever get recorded? For example, it seemed pretty well established early on that there was a three strikes and it goes to a vote to break the filibuster rule, but only after the third so-called violation, did it come up that only germaneness issues were supposed to matter with respect to ending the filibuster. Knowing more about that would be great. Also, if someone could lay out early the expected course of SB5 in the special session, that might be useful. How quickly can it come to the floor for a vote, how long is the session, etc.?

      It must have been just amazing to see Wendy Davis. From my home, she just seemed like she could go forever. Her statements were clear as a bell and she kept coming up with new things to say – but frankly, even when she reread parts of the bill she sounded so strong. From my perspective, she most certainly didn’t stray off course when she discussed the sonogram law, given that one of the arguments against the bill as I understand it is that women will need to not only travel FAR to one of the 5 potentially remaining clinics, but they’ll have to spend a night (or make a return trip). This act of having to spend the night makes the FAR part even more burdensome, and a reason some might vote against the law.

      On the internet, it was just incredible to hear all the noise that the gallery was making – and then to learn that the noise was throughout the hallways on the second floor from your post really touched me.

      Again bravo to you and everyone else there helping to get the job done. Just amazing work.


      1. Germaneness objections only started after third point of order, I think, because all Senators know that the Senate Rules clearly outline that ONLY germaneness counts. She can get a warning for something else, but they didn’t expect it to count towards her “3 strikes.”

        We just don’t know yet about the second special session. The transportation bill & execution bill will also be on the call, but we don’t know when what will happen until a schedule is released and so far, there isn’t one.

        She was absolutely incredible, and though lost steam at one point, regained her strength — from looking up at the 500 people in the gallery & knowledge of the thousands in rest of Capitol — according to her own statements. I’m so proud. Her “germaneness” violations occurred when she was clearly talking about relevant facts, so that was unbelievable. Agreed re: distance. It’s why she was discussing the harmful layering of the sonogram bill + SB5.

        Thank you! When we heard the gallery erupt, we all instantly realized what could be done — and wasn’t just the second floor, either. Third floor outside the gallery, second floor outside Senate chambers, and every floor of the rotunda.

  3. Tweeted your thorough, fact-based coverage, nice work. Texax women rock! Will continue to follow developments – it’s about time somebody checked these disrespectful, uninformed Neanderthals.


    1. Thank you Cyndi! Really appreciate the support from across the country. Facts & votes are on our side, it’s a shame 20 people can ram through a bill that 80% of Texas (49% conservative) don’t believe should be passed. We will continue to be present and tweet & blog the TRUE facts of what’s happening.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s